FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Peter Hendrick, Executive Director
The American Association of Radon Scientists & Technologists (AARST)
14 Pratt Road Alstead, NH 03602
Phones:
603-756-9259
Email: director@aarst.org
Is Fannie Mae’s
American Dreaming Killing You!
We’ve
all seen the Fannie Mae TV commercials - compelling visuals of a beautiful
American family standing by a white picket fence surrounding their first home
as the narrator proudly acclaims, “At Fannie Mae, we’re in the
American Dream Business.”
In launching the expanded American Dream Commitment in January
of 2004, Fannie Mae Chairman and CEO Frank Raines reiterated a phrase from
their mission statement: “Having a safe place to call home strengthens
families, communities, and our nation as a whole. We are committed to
the highest standards of safety and soundness”
But
Fannie’s definition of a “safe place to call home” may be different from
your own. For example, would you consider your house to be safe it was
contaminated with dangerous levels of airborne radiation – an invisible and
odorless toxic gas estimated to cause 21,000 American lung-cancer deaths every
year?
Federal
legislation intended to protect an unknowing public from deadly radon gas
exposure was passed in 1988, yet the Department of Housing and Urban
Development has ignored it for over 15 years, allowing applicants of FHA, VA
and Fannie Mae insured mortgages to continue purchasing homes that have never
been checked for the presence of indoor radon.
The Stewart McKinney
Amendments to the 1988 Indoor Radon Abatement Act require the HUD to develop a
plan to “assist the EPA in the development of measures to avoid and reduce
radon contamination.” And the section of Code of Federal Regulations
written for compliance with the National Environmental Policy Act states, "It is HUD policy that
all property proposed for use in HUD programs be free of hazardous materials,
contamination, toxic chemicals and gasses, and radioactive substances, where a
hazard could affect the health and safety of occupants or conflict with the
intended utilization of the property."
Accordingly, as part of Fannie Mae’s Residential
Appraisal Report, the appraiser is required to answer the question, “Are
there any apparent adverse environmental conditions (hazardous waste, toxic
substances, etc) present in the improvements, on the site, or in the immediate
vicinity of the subject property?” Appraisers routinely answer this
question “no”, without ever conducting a radon test, even if the
property is located in a county designated as “High Radon Potential” by
the EPA’s Map of Radon Zones.
There is not even a
requirement that applicants for government insured mortgages be told that radon
is a Class-A carcinogen and the 2nd leading cause of lung cancer,
much less a requirement to test. They are however, required to have a termite
inspection.
In May of 1991, Richard
Hembra of the U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) testified before the Senate
Appropriations Committee stating, “HUD’s radon policy does not meet
legislative requirements”. In December of 1992, GAO reported to a House
Committee that HUD could easily assist EPA in reducing radon contamination as
directed by the McKinney Amendments stating. “Because of the influence
federal housing agencies and federally chartered secondary mortgage
institutions have on the housing industry, requiring them to address radon
could stimulate radon testing for the nation’s homes.”
GAO went on to report
that, “Although these housing agencies and mortgage institutions have the
authority to require disclosure or testing, some cited various reasons for not
doing so. Some mortgage institution officials said they do not consider radon a
mortgage risk. For example, Fannie Mae
officials stated that the presence of radon has not resulted in any loan
defaults.”
So the hard truth appears
Fannie would only be concerned about the home occupants being exposed to
dangerous radon contamination only if it could result in a loan default. (Sort of takes the “warm and fuzzies” out of
the American Dream business, doesn’t it?)
Chairman Raines lists “Integrity”
as one of his four principles of corporate governance. “To ensure trust in Fannie Mae,” states Raines, “Fannie
Mae must be trustworthy. We strive to hold every individual at Fannie Mae -- from our Board of
Directors to the Chairman and CEO to senior management to every employee -- to
the highest standards of honesty, integrity and accountability. Integrity must
be part of the Fannie Mae culture.”
There is little argument in the
lending industry that Fannie Mae has grown to be so successful because they
have a distinct advantage in the marketplace: the full faith and credit of the
U.S. government to back their securities.
“In order to earn that
competitive advantage”, says Dallas Jones, Chairman of the American Radon
Policy Coalition, “the very least they can do is ensure the public health in
the process. I see little integrity and accountability when the
nation’s number one provider of federally insured mortgages fails to take an
active role to address the most deadly issue in housing today, particularly
since radon-induced lung cancer is so preventable.”
In the 15 years since the
passage in the McKinney Amendments, 2½ million Americans have died of lung
cancer. Over 17% of all lung cancers occur in non-smokers, the 5 year survival
rate for lung cancer is less than 15% and lung cancer is by far, the number one
cancer killer in America.
According
to newly revised risk assessments for radon exposure, approximately 315,000
Americans (over the last 15 years) were victims of radon-induced lung
cancer. Since public ignorance about
radon generally prevents them from ever making a connection to their radon
exposure, the non-smokers generally assume it was simply an unfortunate case of
bad luck.
Thirty-eight
year old Elizabeth Hoffmann of Milwaukee was diagnosed with lung cancer in late
2003. Neither Liz, nor her husband has
ever smoked and she has no family history of lung cancer. Her oncologist, like
so many, offered no explanation as to what could be the cause.
Searching
for explanation, Elizabeth’s father came across radon information on the EPA
website and tested the residence Liz and her husband had been living in since
they were married 15 years ago. The
house was seriously contaminated. With grit and determination, Liz now fights
for her life through surgery, chemo and radiation therapies. For Liz and her
family, their American dream has turned into a nightmare.